It's my job to tell people where they can and cannot post. Leave that task to me. I can handle it just fine.
While the list is overall not bad, it makes several inaccurate assumptions which throws it's accuracy off somewhat. It's more good than bad.This is for uneducated, ignorant dog owners, this is a good rating tool that will help them see that there are better foods out there than Science Diet.
Bill
Feeding raw since 2002
http://www.skylarzack.com/rawfeeding.htm
"Unnatural diets predispose animals to unnatural outcomes"
Dr. Tom Lonsdale
Here are a few it gave me after I rated Blue Wilderness, although I wasn't completely sure on some of the questions, but answered to the best of my ability.
Your score is: 107 out of 100 Grade: A+
Horizon Pet Food - Legacy Adult Dog Food 107 A+
Addiction - Viva La Venison - Dry Dog Food 101 A+
Nature's Variety - Instinct Chicken Meal - Dog Food 106 A+
Orijen Adult 110 A+
Wellness Core - Original Dog Food 105 A+
Believe it or not, us RAW feeders have quite a bit to contribute to this section of the forum, considering we have all at one point or another been kibble feeders ourselves. No member of this forum is confined to one section. This kind of hostility is unwarranted and unnecessary.
I find this tool to be faulty in many ways. (TOTW scoring higher as Acana is kind of a joke, and there are SO many factors not even considered.)
That being said, I think it's a good eye-opener for the people who buy Purina type foods, thinking they're great. I suppose it's a good "starting point" for someone just discovering the complex world of commercial dog food.
This has been posted a number of times.
--Linsey--
RAW feeding my CARNIVORES since 2009
The DANES: Mousse, Zailey, Braxton, Timber & Kola.
Annie the Boxer, Griffin the Pembroke Welsh Corgi
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)